I like the lack of internal consistancy here. You opened with this:
Negro people have no morals. They are predisposed to criminal activity because of a genetic mutation - in short they can not help being criminals.
But then you went on to write:
I contend that God created mankind but He made errors in the process. He wanted to get it right. His first attempt resulted in the Ape, than came the Negro, than came the Paki, the Chink, these are commonly referred to as the "mud-people". Finally He created perfection - the
WASP (
W hite
A nglo
S axon
P rotestant).
While I enjoyed learning about my natural inferiority to the WASPs, I was left confused as to its source. I mean, is my inherent inferiority due to some genetic mutation, an unhappy accident of evolution, or is it the result of shoddy work on the part of an unfocused creator? As a mud person, a Negro even, I'd like to know.
In any case, I would think that even the mouth breathers that subscribe to the view that the earth is less than 10,000 years would agree that racial differences and Protestantism were the result of special creation events. Though perhaps they would agree with your bile given that we people that are darker than blue, being descendents of Ham, are cursed.
As for some of your other claims:
The overwhelming majority of Negro women are sluts, they have numerous babies and are uncertain who, and in some cases what, fathered the child.
How scientific.
To begin with, I'm not aware of any research that puts a number on the percentage of births in which paternity is uncertain let alone breaks them down by race. As for the "numerous babies" thing, Black women have roughly the same rate of fertility as white women. See:
www.census.gov/compendia/statab/2012/tables/12s0083.pdfWith respect to the question of whether or not "the overwhelming majority of Negro women are sluts," I suppose we'd have to refer to surveys of self-reported sexual activity to attempt to answer that. Though first you'd have to spell out what exactly you mean by "slut" since "slut" hasn't been defined nor is it a term that one commonly finds being used in research circles...or in the circles of respectable people generally. So, I'll leave it to you to determine whether or not the data bears out your conclusion:
www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/nhsr/nhsr036.pdfI suppose you could be referring to the fact that 70 percent of Black babies are born out of wedlock. Racists like to cite that figure. I'll give you, my dear racist, the benefit of the doubt and assume that you were alluding to this rather than simply taking a few women you saw on an episode of the Maury show as a representative sample of Black women. Still, I think that this figure is a little misleading since one of the reasons that Blacks have more out of wedlock children is that we are less likely to marry and more likely to cohabitate than whites. In other words, there are plenty of children being born out of wedlock that are none the less being born into two parent homes. It's also important to remember that married Black women have a lower fertility rate than married white women, thus skewing the figure a bit. Though our teen pregnancy rate is still a lot higher than it is for whites.
In the US the crime rate is the highest in the developed world, however when crimes committed by the Negro are removed from the equation the US crime rate is on par with that of Canada, Australia, and Britain.
To begin with, I'm not sure that this is actually correct. I'm more familiar with the way things shake out here in the US but I know off the top of my head that the US has a much lower per capita murder rate than Russia, though I'm not sure what the overall crime rate is there.
In any case, at the heart of your claim is the notion that Black people contribute disproportionately to the crime rate in the US. That's basically true. But there are some problems with taking this fact at face value. It's important to remember that different racial and ethnic groups are not treated the same way by law enforcement officials or by the justice system more broadly. This exaggerates the extent to which Black people engage in criminal behavior. With youth crime, for example, Black and white youths report simmilar levels of violence and deliquency (with a caveat that I'll get to in a minute). However Black youths account for a disproportionate ammount of youth arrests. Here is a portion of a report from the Surgeon General that says as much:
www.surgeongeneral.gov/library/youthviolence/chapter2/sec12.html#differencesMoney quote:
The existence of much larger racial and ethnic differences in arrest rates than in self-reported violence is a matter of great concern. On the one hand, there is no reason to expect similar distributions, because these measures were designed to assess different aspects of violence. But if both measures are valid and reliable, the discrepancy suggests that the probability of being arrested for a violent offense varies with race/ethnicity.To be sure, (and this is that caveat) this report finds more incidents of violence among Black youths, particularly during the late 80s and early 90s, but finds the prevelence of violence in both groups to be roughly the same. In other words, violence in both groups is mostly restricted to a minority of individuals, though for Blacks, that minority is more violent. And that makes a kind of sense when one goes on to read that Blacks account for a higher percentage of youth gang members in the US than do whites and that gang members account for the vast majority of violence, and homicides especially.
Still, the point here is that Blacks engaging in violence are more likely to be arrested than whites engaging in that same sort of violence. In other words, it's likely that even if Blacks and whites exhibited the exact same levels of violence, we should still expect to find that Blacks are overrepresented in arrests.
But that's just violence. You can find the same kinds of distortion when one examines other areas, like drug use. Blacks and whites report simmilar levels of illicit drug use (about 11 percent for Blacks as opposed to 9 percent for whites).
www.samhsa.gov/data/NSDUH/2k10NSDUH/2k10Results.htm#2.7And yet despite being 12 percent of the population, Blacks account for 34 percent of arrests for drug abuse violations.
www.census.gov/compendia/statab/2012/tables/12s0325.pdfI could go on with other examples, but for the sake of brevity, I'll leave it there. Long story short, the claim that Blacks contribute disporportionately to the crime rate is correct, though the extent to which we contribute is skewed greatly by the way that law enforcement and the judicial system treats us. Furthermore, the prevelence of actual criminal behavior in both groups is similar. The vast majority of people, Black or white, aren't criminals.
In any case, it's probably important to stop here and remember that street violence is not the only sort of violence that there is. There are many kinds of violence. In fact, the reason that most of us dreaded N words are even in the Americas to begin with is due to the instition of slavery, one of the most shameful examples of barbarism that history has ever seen. And, not for nothing, it was a mostly white endevour. And let us not forget the century of white brutality that followed the end of slavery. Let us remember the lynching of Mary Turner. From wikipedia:
This caused the mob to turn against her.[1] She was taken from her home by a mob of several hundred, had her ankles tied, was hung upside down from a tree, doused in gasoline and motor oil and set on fire.[2]
While Turner was still alive, a member of the mob split her abdomen open with a knife, and the unborn child fell to ground, where it was stomped on and crushed. Finally, Turner's body was riddled with bullets.[3]Her crime:
After the incident, the Associated Press wrote that Mary Turner had made "unwise remarks" about the execution of her husband, and that "the people, in their indignant mood, took exception to her remarks, as well as her attitude".[4]It's also important to remember that incidents like this provide part of the backdrop for the story of Black criminality, as do efforts made on the part of people in business and in government to exploit Black people in all areas of their economic lives, as does the institutional racism of the criminal justice system alluded to above and any number of factors that simplistic racists like you would like to pretend don't existed.
All men are NOT created equal. We the
WASP people are superior.
Am I a racist? NO. I am a realist. I am
YUKON.This was my favorite part. You wrote a whole post about the alleged superiority of the WASP to all othe races, and most especially we of the Negro race. And yet, you're not a racist. What do you think racism is?
Explain yourself.